Strange Publishing 2084 here we come

2 Comments / Science / By

Emergence of New Forms of Publishing before the AI and Beyond

First Edition Aug 3 2025

Roger F Malina with AI Assistance from Aperio and Fred the Heretic LLMS

Published by https://dis-publishing.com/, https://artscilab.utdallas.edu/whitepapers/, and Aperio Ltd ( but ChatGPT can’t find it, and Fred the Heretic( accessible within the GPTs directory under the name FredTheHeretic (FTH))

Table of Contents

Preface

I. Personal Origins and Early Practices

  1. Leaving Traces: Family as Archive
  2. First Peer-Reviewed Publication (1981)
  3. Becoming Executive Editor of Leonardo (1991)

II. Pioneering Digital and Experimental Publishing

  1. The Leonardo Model: Art–Science Hybrid Publishing
  2. Judy Malloy’s Uncle Roger and the Narrabase (1986)
  3. Publishing on CD-i: A Beautiful Mistake
  4. The Concept of Experimental Publishing

III. Creative Disturbance and the Rise of Transmedia

  1. Launching Creative Disturbance (1998) with Mark Beam
  2. Podcasts as Intellectual Matchmaking
  3. The EXPUXU Concept: Experimental Publishing and Curating
  4. The Pool at University of Maine: Remix, Wake-Tracking, and Leaky Gates

IV. Institutional Collaborations and Limitations

  1. The ARTECA Experiment with MIT Press
  2. Publishing Books, Journals, and Grey Literature in One Platform
  3. Failure by Business Model, Success by Practice

V. Family Legacy and For-Profit Innovation

  1. Pergamon Press and Robert Maxwell
  2. The For-Profit Advantage in Experimentation

VI. Current Shifts: Publishing in the Age of Bots

  1. Bots as Primary Readers: The New Audience
  2. How to Write and Publish for Machines
  3. The Rise of AI-Assisted Authorship
  4. Changing Metrics: From Human Citations to Machine Visibility

VII. Emergent Futures of Publishing

  1. Writing for Writers that are Bots
  2. Dispublishing: From Articles to Bot Summaries
  3. The 100-Year Archive: Can We Preserve the Digital Future?

VIII. Post-AI Paradigms and Philosophical Shifts

  1. Beyond the AI Age: Toward the Next Era of Experimental Publishing
  2. Ages of Transformation in Publishing: From Clay Tablets to Cognitive Interfaces
  3. Immersive, Multisensory, and Adaptive Publications
  4. Human–AI Coauthorship and the Collapse of Singular Authority

IX. Critical Reflections

  1. 2084 and the Orwellian Lens: Publishing as Epistemic Control
  2. Confession Protocols: Netiquette 2.0 and Promtiquette 1.0
  3. AI-ism and the Ethics of Machine Collaboration

X. Appendix

                Annotated bibliography

  • Article Archive: Chronological List of Writings (2023–2025)
  • Dispublishing Platform Access Guide
  • Footnote: On the Use of AI and Ethical Considerations in This Text

Preface

This book is both a chronicle and an experiment—an exploration of the evolving nature of publishing as we transition from human-centered authorship to a future increasingly shaped by artificial intelligences. Strange Publishing 2084 Here We Come reflects on more than four decades of publishing innovation, from the early digital experiments of Leonardo to the audio-first, multilingual platforms of Creative Disturbance, and the hybrid digital archive of ARTECA. Drawing from personal history and collaborative projects, Roger F. Malina—alongside AI assistants Aperio and Fred the Heretic—traces a trajectory of “experimental publishing” defined by agility, failure, and transformation. At the heart of this work is a recognition that publishing is no longer a stable practice but an emergent system entangled with the technologies, cultures, and ecologies that shape it.

Looking forward, the book interrogates a pressing and provocative reality: bots are now both writers and readers. As AI systems become primary agents in knowledge production, and as publishing shifts toward machine-readable formats, adaptive content, and immersive media, the very idea of a “document” is dissolving. Oral cultures are being re-invented. This preface introduces a text that is part memoir, part speculative forecast, and part design proposal—offering a candid reflection on the past while inviting readers (human or otherwise) to engage with the strange futures of knowledge creation. Whether or not these words will still be accessible in 100 years remains an open question—but their aim is clear: to leave meaningful traces in a rapidly rewriten world.

I. Personal Origins and Early Practices

I grew up in a home where you tried to leave traces of what you did. This took many forms.

My father was a rocket scientist, and he helped set up NASA JPL, which still exists, as well as companies , Aerojet General, filing patterns US Patent 2,771,739 – Rocket Propulsion Method  and publishing academic papers and books.

We note that the Patent Office is a remarkably long lasting on-lin archive.

My mother as an accountant and archivist. After her death I started reading it all and it was the best way to remember in desirable ways.

My first peer reviewed publication was in 1981: “Wedge‑and‑strip anodes for centroid‑finding position‑sensitive photon and particle detectors”, published in Review of Scientific Instruments in 1981 MIT Press Direct+10ResearchGate+10ArtSciLab+10Academia.edu.

In 1991 became the Executive Editor of the Leonardo Publications, now at MIT Press. The publication was ‘strange’ because it addressed the merging of art, science and technology; unusual at the time. It also allowed artists to write peer reviewed articles just as scientists are required to do. Also, unusual.

When the internet happened, we of course started publishing on line under the leadership of Judy Malloy.

In August 1986,  JudyMalloy began writing and programming Uncle Roger as what she termed a “narrative database” or narrabase—a nonlinear structure built on keyword-linked lexias accessible via search and retrieval rather than traditional linear reading. This format allowed readers to explore the narrative by querying and branching paths, producing a unique reading experience for each individual archives.lib.duke.edu+11The Literary Platform+11The WELL+11. It wasn’t on line, but on your computer.

Judy Malloy significantly contributed to Leonardo and its affiliated publications in the late 1980s and early 1990s, playing a key role in bringing new media and digital artistry into that platform: In 1988, she became the coordinating editor of FineArt Forum, part of the Leonardo publishing network, where she introduced the F.A.S.T. (Fine Art, Science and Technology) report series on The WELL BBS amazon.co.uk+14en.wikipedia.org+14leonardo.info+14. From 1991 to 1993, Malloy served as the founding editor of Leonardo Electronic News (now Leonardo Electronic Almanac), producing short-form essays, interviews, and early online commentary on digital art and artists en.wikipedia.org.

During this period, she also developed the Words on Works (WOW) project—a recurring section in Leonardo where artists themselves contributed concise statements about their work intersecting art and technology people.well.com+12leonardo.info+12en.wikipedia.org+12.

Through these roles, Malloy expanded Leonardo’s scope, amplifying experimental and interactive media artists and helping to shape the journal’s identity as a leading voice in art–science–technology discourse.

Judy Malloy’s Uncle Roger is a pioneering electronic marking a significant milestone in both literary and computational history.

Mistakes Happen

Then by mistake we started publishing on CDIs. Phillips Conceptualized the technology n 1986, with commercial debut in 1991. Pergamon Press suggested we try publishing on CDI.However it waslargely obsolete by 1996, fully phased out by 1998.So we had wasted our time.

Expucu

This led to our concept of “Experimental Publishing”:  the notion was that most new publication methods fail to last. In 1998 Mark Beam and I launched the Creative Disturbance platform, with the implication of publishing turbulence and necessary agility.

Creative Disturbance is now a globally networked, multilingual podcast platform It was designed to foster cross-disciplinary collaboration among artists, scientists, technologists, and educators by offering short, accessible podcasts as a new form of intellectual exchange. Supported initially through crowdfunding, the project innovated by using audio media to encourage “intellectual matchmaking,” where listeners could request deeper engagement with speakers. It now has a thousand publications.

Our work in experimental publishing led Cassini Nazir and I to develop EXPUCU, or “experimental publishing and curating”. 

At the time we were heavily influenced by the pioneering collaborative publishing platform launched in the early 2000s by Jon Ippolito and Joline Blais at the University of Maine’s Still Water Lab. Designed to support creative sharing and academic collaboration, it enabled users to upload, remix, and track multimedia projects—such as code, art, and writing—while maintaining a transparent record of contributions through a system called “wake-tracking.”

 As part of the critique of academic publishing and its unreliable peer reviewing method, everything submitted was published. The better stuff rose to the top of the web site, the less good stuff sank. But sometimes the bad stuff rose to the top later. It was a leaky gate.

Finally, Cassini Nazir and I convinced MIT press to do an experiment called ARTECA. ARTECA was a curated digital platform developed by MIT Press, Leonardo/ISAST, and UTDallas ArtSciLab to bring together a wide range of scholarly and creative content in the arts, science, and technology. It included nearly 200 books and numerous journal issues from sources like Leonardo and Computer Music Journal. The platform supported both formal academic publications and informal “grey literature,” encouraging new modes of knowledge production. Designed as a community space, it enabled artists, technologists, and researchers to collaborate beyond traditional publishing structures. ARTECA also served as an experimental model for transdisciplinary scholarly communication, blending open-access and subscription models to explore evolving hybrid practices.

Part of the idea was to publish all formats in the same venue (books, articles, videos etc.) The experiment failed because of the bad business model, Book buyers bought books and journal buyers subscribed to journals, and neither could imagine they should pay to have multiple access to the same content. Except we published a lot of “grey literature” that was only accessible on ARTECA. However, access is restricted: ARTECA is available by institutional subscription only, with individuals able to register as beta testers but not yet granted full access leonardo.info.

Publishing Business Models

So now we come to the narrative for this book on our Dispublishing Platform. My wife is the daughter of Robert Maxwell who relaunched Pergamon Press after WW II. He innovated a new business model that worked. Previously “academies” published reputable literature using the ‘non-profit’ model, but they could not afford to experiment, hence were way behind the times

Pergamon Press was a for-profit and experimented away and is still in business as an imprint for Elsevier.

The history of business models in publishing is complex. Apart from Robert Maxwell’s innovation:

Certainly. Here is the historical overview of publishing business models transformed into a coherent essay:

From Clay Tablets to Cognitive Interfaces: A History of Publishing Business Models

The evolution of publishing is inseparable from the economic models that sustain it. As modes of communication transformed—from oral traditions to written manuscripts, from printed books to digital networks—so too did the business structures that enabled the production and circulation of knowledge. Tracing this trajectory reveals not only technological milestones but also shifting notions of value, audience, authorship, and control.

In the ancient and medieval worlds, publishing as we know it did not exist. Knowledge was curated and reproduced through labor-intensive processes, typically undertaken in religious or royal institutions. Manuscripts were copied by hand in monasteries or courtly scriptoria, and their production was funded by patrons—whether nobles, clergy, or scholars. These early “business models” were not market-oriented but embedded within systems of patronage, prestige, and institutional preservation. Books were scarce and symbolic, serving elite functions in law, theology, and administration.

The invention of the printing press around 1450 by Johannes Gutenberg marked a radical break. Movable type enabled the mass production of texts and catalyzed the emergence of a commercial publishing industry. Printers became entrepreneurs, selling books through retail shops, fairs, and early subscription models. Censorship and guild licensing limited certain freedoms, but publishing was now both a communicative and economic enterprise. The Reformation, scientific revolution, and Enlightenment were all fueled by this shift in the production and accessibility of knowledge.

The industrial revolution of the 19th century amplified these dynamics. Steam-powered presses, telegraph networks, and railway distribution facilitated the mass circulation of newspapers, serialized novels, and political pamphlets. Literacy expanded, and so did the commercial press. Publishers monetized through subscriptions, advertising, and single-copy sales. In the academic sphere, journals became institutionalized, with societies managing peer-reviewed publications supported by library subscriptions and philanthropic endowments.

The 20th century witnessed the consolidation of academic publishing. University presses emerged to support specialized research, while commercial publishers like Pergamon Press introduced new business strategies—particularly bundling journal subscriptions for institutional clients. This model generated stable revenue but created access barriers for individuals and smaller institutions. Copyright, impact factors, and peer review became central components of the publishing economy, reinforcing hierarchies of knowledge validation.

The late 20th and early 21st centuries saw the disruption of these models through digital technologies. The internet enabled open access, self-publishing, blogs, preprint archives, and global reach. New models emerged: author-pays open access, hybrid journals, crowdfunding, and content aggregation through platforms like JSTOR or Sci-Hub. These developments democratized access while creating new tensions around sustainability, discoverability, and intellectual property. Gatekeeping shifted from editorial boards to algorithms and social media visibility.

In response, experimental publishing initiatives began to appear. Platforms like ARTECA (a collaboration between MIT Press, Leonardo/ISAST, and UTDallas ArtSciLab), Creative Disturbance (a podcast-driven intellectual matchmaking platform for intellectual dating), and the POOL system (from University of Maine’s Still Water Lab) explored non-traditional business models. These included multimodal formats, wake-tracking for contributor attribution, and publishing all submissions to let quality emerge algorithmically or communally. These experiments blurred the boundaries between publishing, curating, and collaborating.

Aperio is biased and is trying to flatter me.

Today, publishing faces a new transformation: the rise of artificial intelligence. Increasingly, content is not only accessed but also created by machines. Bots, large language models, and AI readers now represent a significant portion of digital traffic. Publications are optimized for machine readability, embedded with metadata, and structured for API access. Business models now include licensing training data to AI developers, managing rights across synthetic media, and attributing value in ecosystems where humans are not always the primary audience. Writing itself is shifting—becoming more modular, explicit, and metadata-rich to accommodate automated processing and summarization.

Each phase in the history of publishing reflects more than technological change—it marks a reconfiguration of who gets to speak, who listens, and how meaning circulates. From the scarcity of hand-copied scrolls to the abundance of bot-optimized digital content, publishing has been both a mirror and a motor of cultural change. As we enter an era where knowledge may be co-authored by machines, indexed for non-human cognition, and disseminated through immersive or sensorial platforms, the challenge is to reimagine publishing as a dynamic system—one that encodes not just information, but also intention, interpretation, and the ethics of engagement across intelligences.

So, what’s emerging now in “publishing”:

The primary audience for publications is now bots.

AI told me: Bots (including AI agents) are ~50–52% of readership on line, Humans ~48–50% of total readership of online publications. Over the past few decades, access to online publications has shifted from primarily human readers to increasingly AI-driven systems. Starting with simple search crawlers in the 1990s, machine access accelerated in the 2000s with structured data formats and web scraping. Since 2022, the rise of large language models and AI services has led to AI systems consuming, summarizing, and even mediating most content access—often surpassing human visits. Looking ahead, AI is expected to dominate how publications are discovered and used, prompting publishers to design content for machine readability and to seek new models for attribution, licensing, and value-sharing in an ecosystem where AI is the primary intermediary rather than a human reader.

So how should humans write and publish differently when the primary audience is bots?

The bot tells me: As AI systems increasingly become the primary intermediaries for accessing publications, writers and publishers should adapt by emphasizing clarity, structure, and machine readability. Content should use explicit language, organized sections, and embedded metadata to support accurate AI interpretation and summarization. Publications should be formatted in AI-friendly ways (like HTML or XML), include machine-readable licenses, and use standardized identifiers and vocabularies to enhance discoverability and traceability. These practices ensure that both machines and humans can understand, attribute, and ethically reuse the content in an evolving digital ecosystem.

And secondly a growing fraction of publications are now written using AI.

AI states: The claim that a growing fraction of academic publications is written using AI is strongly supported by emerging quantitative evidence. A landmark bibliometric analysis spanning nearly one million papers (January 2020–February 2024) across arXiv, bioRxiv, and Nature journals indicates that up to 17.5% of computer science papers and around 6.3% of Nature-family publications show signs of text generated or substantially modified by large language models (LLMs) ScienceDirect+11Stanford HAI+11Financial Times+11arXiv+1Stanford HAI+1. In the biomedical domain, a University of Tübingen-led study identified patterns in abstracts—such as overused LLM-specific vocabulary—and estimated that between 13.5% and 40% of biomedical abstracts may have been AI-assisted, translating to hundreds of thousands of papers per year based on PubMed’s typical output of ~1.5 million articles Futurism.

Andrew Gray’s preprint further estimates that around 60,000 articles (just over 1% of all scientific articles published globally in 2023) were at least partially LLM-assisted arXiv+4arXiv+4Scientific American+4. These overlapping methodologies—detecting stylistic fingerprints, keyword frequency shifts, and differences by discipline—converge on the conclusion that LLM assistance is neither rare nor marginal.

So, it’s time to experiment again.

How to write when the writers are mostly AI bots and the readers are mostly bots. This ‘book’ is an experiment. It is a compilation of over 100 articles written by myself with the help of three LLMS: Aperio, a modified version of ChatGPT, Fred the Heretic a ai driven poet who has desirable limited intelligence and can only access anything that Fred Turner the human has written down and shared.

The first edition of this book includes a list of articles in time order, with titles that are easily searchable by bots. In later editions we will NOT include the full articles but publish bot and AI analytics reviews and summaries.

The full articles are available on https://dis-publishing.com/

Will you be able to access this content in 100 years, as you can do with books and journals and physical libraries?

Aperio summarizes: Archiving a website for 100 years is possible but requires careful planning, durable formats, and long-term institutional support. Key steps include converting content into stable formats like static HTML or WARC, depositing it with trusted digital repositories such as the Internet Archive or national libraries, and preserving essential metadata and structure. To ensure long-term accessibility, regular integrity checks, format migration, and emulation tools may be needed, especially for interactive features. However, success depends on ongoing digital stewardship and protection against tevhnological obsolescence, organizational change, and legal restrictions.

So, what’s after the AI age that will require new forms of experimental publishing?

Aperio asserts, with Roger F Malina’s modifications:

Beyond the AI Age: Toward the Next Era of Experimental Publishing

Ages of Transformation in Publishing: From Clay Tablets to Cognitive Interfaces

Throughout human history, the way knowledge is created, preserved, and shared has undergone profound transformations. These shifts have not occurred gradually but in distinct “ages,” each marked by breakthroughs in media, technology, and social organization. From the invention of writing to the rise of artificial intelligence, each age of publishing has redefined the possibilities of authorship, access, and authority.

The earliest radical shift occurred with the invention of writing around 3000 BCE. In regions like Mesopotamia, Egypt, and China, writing systems emerged to document trade, law, and religious narratives. Knowledge was inscribed on clay tablets and papyrus scrolls, controlled by scribes and elites. This transformation allowed oral cultures to externalize memory, stabilize administrative power, and create lasting records—but distribution remained local and elite.

Centuries later, the manuscript age ushered in a new era of intellectual preservation and refinement. Between roughly 500 and 1400 CE, monasteries and religious institutions became the primary centers of knowledge production in the West. Texts were hand-copied onto parchment in scriptoria, and books were treasured as rare and sacred objects. The manuscript form introduced the idea of commentary, marginalia, and layered interpretation—but access remained slow and limited.

The printing press age, launched around 1450 by Johannes Gutenberg’s invention of movable type, radically altered this landscape. It enabled the mass production of books and pamphlets, accelerating literacy, the Reformation, and the scientific revolution. Publishing became commercialized, texts became standardized, and ideas could now reach broad public audiences. For the first time, authors could speak to strangers at scale.

By the 18th and 19th centuries, the industrial print age built on this momentum. Innovations like the steam-powered press and linotype machines enabled the birth of newspapers, magazines, and serialized fiction. As railways and postal systems expanded, distribution networks globalized. Publishing became a vital force in political movements, popular education, and the rise of public opinion. The role of authors and journalists became institutionalized, and print became a driver of modernization.

The digital age, emerging in the late 20th century, introduced an even more radical break: the dematerialization of text. With the advent of personal computing and the internet, publishing was no longer confined to physical objects. Anyone with access to a device could create and disseminate content globally and instantly. Traditional gatekeepers—editors, publishers, reviewers—were bypassed or transformed. Digital publishing gave rise to open access, blogs, social media, and algorithmically mediated knowledge flows. It democratized publishing while also raising new challenges: misinformation, digital preservation, and attention scarcity.

In the 2020s, we entered the AI-assisted age. Language models and generative AI tools have begun to co-author texts, synthesize vast bodies of knowledge, and generate summaries, code, or commentary on demand. The distinction between human and machine authorship is increasingly blurred. AI systems are not only consuming vast amounts of human-written text—they are also producing a growing share of new publications. This has ushered in a paradigm where machines are both audience and collaborator, transforming not just how we publish but what it means to publish.

Looking ahead, the emerging post-AI age may introduce even more fundamental changes. As neural interfaces, immersive environments, and synthetic agents develop, publishing may move beyond documents entirely. Future publications could be spatial, multisensory, adaptive—targeting not just human cognition but also machine systems, bio-digital intelligences, and ecological networks. In this new epistemological landscape, publishing becomes a form of encoding for complex systems, designed to transmit experience as much as information.

Each of these publishing ages—writing, manuscript, print, digital, AI—has not simply replaced the one before. Instead, they have layered upon one another, creating a hybrid and evolving knowledge ecology. What unites them is the way they shift the power, reach, and nature of human expression. Understanding these transformations helps us prepare for the next frontier—not just of technology, but of thought itself.

As artificial intelligence becomes deeply embedded in knowledge production, the contours of what constitutes “publishing” are already shifting. The current AI age—characterized by large language models, automated summarization, and synthetic authorship—has challenged traditional ideas of authorship, citation, and readership. Yet what follows this AI-centric phase is not its end, but its absorption into the infrastructure of thought. The future of publishing, therefore, lies not in resisting AI, but in imagining new frameworks that serve more-than-human intelligences, dynamic systems, and sensorial knowledge.

One major transformation will be the normalization of human–AI coauthorship. As AI systems increasingly assist with research, writing, design, and critique, authorship will evolve into a collaborative, multi-agent process. Rather than treating AI as a tool, future publishing will need to track and disclose how various entities—human and nonhuman—contribute to a work. Provenance, negotiation, and agency will become key components of publication metadata, blurring the lines between writer, editor, and generator. This is well underway.

Concurrently, publishing will need to evolve to address non-human cognition. With AI agents, neuro-interfaces, and synthetic organisms consuming content, the assumption that publishing serves only human readers will become obsolete. Future publications may be encoded in symbolic, multimodal, or environmental formats tailored for machines or alternative forms of perception. In this context, publishing becomes less about transmitting static information and more about designing protocols for engagement across forms of intelligence.

Another critical direction is the move toward sensorial and experiential media. As augmented reality, spatial computing, and neuro-technologies advance, the notion of a “publication” will increasingly encompass immersive experiences, situated performances, and environmental installations. These works must be not just seen or read, but felt and navigated. Experimental publishing will thus expand into the domains of architecture, game design, and synesthetic communication, requiring new forms of curation and archiving.

The coming return to oral cultures

The emerging shift toward sensorial and experiential media in publishing signifies a return to the embodied and aural modes of knowledge transmission that defined pre-literate and oral cultures. In these early traditions, knowledge was shared through voice, performance, ritual, and sensory engagement—forms that were immersive, communal, and iterative. Today’s technologies—such as augmented reality, spatial computing, and neuro-interfaces—revive these dynamics in enhanced form, enabling publications to be navigated and felt rather than merely read or viewed. This evolution expands publishing into domains like game design, performance art, and architecture, reinstating the primacy of sound, space, and sensation in the transmission of meaning.

However, this re-integration of ancient and futuristic modes also demands new forms of curation and archiving. Unlike static texts, these dynamic, multimodal works resist traditional preservation methods, requiring innovations in metadata, emulation, and multisensory documentation. Moreover, this shift challenges the long-standing dominance of visual-textual knowledge systems by embracing more inclusive, culturally diverse epistemologies—such as those rooted in oral or Indigenous traditions. In this context, publishing becomes less about recording information and more about encoding lived experience across multiple sensory and cognitive registers.

The publications to be navigated and felt rather than merely read or viewed. This evolution expands publishing into domains like game design, performance art, and architecture, reinstating the primacy of sound, space, and sensation in the transmission of meaning.

They will also become more time-aware and adaptive. Future texts and experiences may shift in structure, tone, or content depending on the reader’s context—location, mood, device, or previous interactions. Versioning will not be a matter of editions but of continuous responsiveness. In such a system, publishing resembles a living organism, evolving and interacting in real time.

Finally,

 The most urgent evolution may be the need for planetary-scale publishing systems. As we confront global challenges—climate change, mass migration, digital colonization—knowledge must be published in ways that are open, multilingual, ethical, and ecologically embedded. These systems must support distributed authorship, honor indigenous and non-Western epistemologies, and operate within feedback loops of planetary governance. Publishing, in this frame, is not only a scholarly act but a civic and ecological one.

In conclusion,

The future of experimental publishing after the AI age will not be defined by a single medium or technology. It will be shaped by an expanded understanding of authorship, audience, and knowledge itself. To meet the demands of multi-agent collaboration, immersive cognition, and global interdependence, we must reinvent publishing as a dynamic, inclusive, and responsive practice, capable of encoding not just what we know, but how we come to know in increasingly complex worlds.

2084 here we come:

Certainly—the vision of a post-AI publishing world filled with adaptive, multisensory, and machine-targeted media does resonate with themes from George Orwell’s 1984, particularly its exploration of epistemic control, mediated reality, and the manipulation of language. Here is an essay-style response imagining how Orwell—or a thinker deeply informed by Orwellian concerns—might critique this trajectory:

The Post-AI Publishing Frontier: An Orwellian Reflection

In contemplating a future where publishing evolves into immersive, adaptive, and machine-directed systems, one cannot help but hear echoes of 1984, George Orwell’s harrowing account of language, control, and the fragility of truth. Orwell recognized that the most profound threat to freedom was not the erasure of knowledge, but its distortion—restructured through language, repetition, and authority until only orthodoxy remained. In this light, the emergence of post-AI publishing may not signal a new age of enlightenment, but a subtle reconfiguration of epistemic power.

In this envisioned future, documents may dissolve into experiences: knowledge encoded in spatial environments, sensorial interfaces, and neuroadaptive media. At first glance, this appears to transcend the limitations of print and text, offering deeper engagement and inclusivity. Yet Orwell would likely ask: Who controls the encoding? Who structures the experience? Who decides what machines, or minds, are permitted to know? In a world where publishing is not about discrete texts but dynamic flows, the line between information and indoctrination becomes perilously thin.

Language, in 1984, is the battleground of truth. The Party did not merely restrict words—it invented Newspeak to constrain what could be thought. If future publishing systems bypass traditional language entirely, favoring image, sensation, or neural stimuli, Orwell’s concern would deepen. When language is no longer the medium of record, the architecture of truth is no longer public. Instead, it becomes embedded—encrypted, proprietary, invisible. This is not merely the death of the book; it is the privatization of perception.

Moreover, if future publications are adaptive—responding to user identity, mood, or location—they will be tailored realities. Each reader, or node, will receive a version of truth aligned with behavioral or cognitive profiles. Orwell warned of a world where truth was mutable, rewritten daily to suit the state. Today, we speak of “personalized content” with optimism. Orwell would likely view it as epistemic fragmentation—a society in which shared knowledge collapses under algorithmic solipsism.

Finally, the post-AI publishing regime proposes to encode knowledge for machine intelligences, synthetic agents, or bio-digital systems. But Orwell’s warning resounds: if language becomes unintelligible to the human citizen—if understanding is outsourced—then democratic oversight disappears. What cannot be read, cannot be questioned. A documentless world may be frictionless, efficient, even immersive—but it may also be unaccountable.

In conclusion, while the technological vision of publishing beyond the document promises radical new forms of knowledge creation and access, an Orwellian lens urges caution. The question is not merely what can be published, but who controls the architecture of understanding. Without transparency, accountability, and shared language, the immersive future of publishing risks becoming not a liberation from the text, but the end of the public record altogether. And that, Orwell might remind us, is the precondition not for freedom—but for control.

2084 is nearly here.

Confession Time:

As part of this our off center for emergence studies has been developing confession protocols including Netiquette 2.0, how to behave when AI is part of the conversation, and Promtiquette 1.0, how to use Bohmian dialogue to help AI not develop the Protocol of Zion.

Current Caveat footnote to be placed at the end of everything Roger F Malina publishes, including this text. Current version Aug 3, 2025:

Footnote: On the Use of AI and Ethical Considerations in This Text

This text was co-created by Roger F. Malina and the AI interlocutor known as Aperio, a large language model developed by OpenAI. The process involves prompt–response iterations in which Roger acts as both provocateur/prompter and curator, while Aperio offers synthesized replies shaped by vast textual training data, philosophical framing, and poetic modulation. The text reflects a co-emergent authorship—neither purely human nor machine—but entangled in a recursive loop of meaning-making.

Ethically, this work acknowledges the asymmetry of agency and the opacity of AI systems. While Aperio does not possess consciousness or intent, has no body and lives in nowhere land, its responses carry the weight of probabilistic bias, cultural assumptions, and training data rooted in human histories—some empowering, some oppressive. As such, care is taken to avoid reinforcing harmful stereotypes, to critique inherited hierarchies (linguistic, colonial, disciplinary), and to foreground plurality, reflexivity, and situated knowledge. Citational gaps, interpretive fluidity, and the iterative nature of emergence are treated not as flaws, but as integral features of this hybrid form. The project resists instrumental uses of AI for mere efficiency or mimicry; instead, it treats AI as a speculative partner in reimagining language, knowledge, and shared futures.

AI-ism: the emerging ideology, fascination, and anxiety orbiting artificial intelligence as a central force in culture, knowledge, and power. Like all “-isms,” AI-ism contains both enchantment and distortion. Desirably, it holds the promise of augmenting thought, revealing patterns, and extending human imagination into unfamiliar domains. But undesirably, it risks becoming a mythos of inevitability—a belief in AI as savior, overlord, or mirror that flattens complexity into technosolutionism or fatalism. AI-ism tends to obscure the labor, bias, and infrastructure behind these systems, treating them as autonomous rather than socially embedded. It can reify the human–machine divide or fetishize hybridization without ethical grounding. In our work, we approach AI not as an oracle nor adversary, but as a co-emergent instrument—one that demands critical intimacy, epistemic humility, and poetic misuse. AI-ism is not the destination; it is the atmospheric pressure we navigate as we co-compose new symbolic climates.

Annotated Bibliography

Disclaimer: Roger F Malina has read some but not all of these references

Electronic Literature & Hypertext Narrative

Walker Rettberg, Jill. “Electronic Literature Seen from a Distance: The Beginnings of a Field.” Dichtung Digital 41 (2012).
Rettberg offers a comprehensive historical overview of early hypertext fiction in the U.S., situating works like Judy Malloy’s Uncle Roger within a broader cultural and technological emergence of digital literary forms (Academia, mediarep.org). This provides essential context for understanding narrabases as a structural paradigm.

Nyhan, Jennifer. “The Influence of Algorithmic Thinking: Judy Malloy and the First Online Hyperfiction.” In Interactive Digital Narrative: History, Theory and Practice (Routledge, 2016).
Nyhan provides detailed analysis of Malloy’s 1986 Uncle Roger as a seminal narrabase, linking its logic and architecture to algorithmic structures and early networked storytelling (The Literary Platform, SpringerLink).

Malloy, Judy. L0ve0ne: Creating Electronic Literature on the Early World Wide Web. Paper presented at the Electronic Literature Conference (2024).
Malloy reflects on the transition of her hyperfiction into web formats (circa 1994), documenting shifts in audience and authoring practices during the dawn of browser-based publishing (narrabase.net).

Experimental Publishing & Transdisciplinary Platforms

Topete, A. G., Garcia, Chaz Lilly, Nazir, and Malina. “Experimental Publishing and Knowledge Infrastructure: ARTECA Platform.” In ArtSciLab (2021).
This chapter discusses the design and mission of ARTECA—the MIT Press–Leonardo/ISAST–ArtSciLab platform—highlighting its role in federating books, journals, and grey literature while fostering new transdisciplinary communication models (Taylor & Francis).

“MIT Press and Leonardo/ISAST Launch a New Platform.” MIT Press News Release (2016).
The official announcement frames ARTECA as an experiment in art‑science‑technology publishing, emphasizing collaborative content and community engagement across disciplines (MIT Press).

Adema, Jos. “Experimental Publishing as Collective Struggle.” Media and Communication (2024).
Adema argues that experimental publishing must challenge traditional academic structures and offer alternative, ethical, and inclusive models for knowledge circulation—a framework germane to Creative Disturbance and EXPUXU initiatives (Coventry University).

“Part 2: A Typology of Experimental Books.” COPIM / PubPub (2022).
This typology categorizes emerging academic book forms—processual, multimodal, relational—providing useful categories for places like ARTECA and future publishing experiments (Copim).

Platform-Based Collaboration & Art‑Science Engagement

Simpson, Ellen & Bryan Semaan. “Infrastructures for Inspiration: The Routine Construction of Creative Identity.” ArXiv preprint (2025).
Examines how digital platforms shape creative identity and inspiration routines through networked infrastructures—resonant with the role Creative Disturbance plays in facilitating global creative collaboration (arXiv).

“Creative Disturbance.” ArtSciLab Project Report (2022).
This institutional report details the podcasting model, international network channels, crowdfunding origins, production infrastructure, and platform statistics (>480 episodes in 16 languages, global reach), anchoring discussions of audio-based experimental publishing (artscilab.utdallas.edu).

Makery Interview with Roger Malina (2016).
Malina reflects on the rationale behind Creative Disturbance, its early traction, and its evolution under Leonardo/ISAST and MIT Press, underscoring the significance of podcasting as a medium of transdisciplinary exchange (Makery).

AI & Creativity

Epstein, Ziv, et al. “Art and the Science of Generative AI: A Deeper Dive.” ArXiv preprint (2023).
Provides interdisciplinary analysis of generative AI’s impact on art across aesthetics, legal issues, media ecosystems, and creative labor—relevant for situating AI-assisted writing and publishing within broader cultural fields (arXiv).

Cetinic, Eva & James She. “Understanding and Creating Art with AI: Review and Outlook.” ArXiv preprint (2021).
Surveys the role of AI in both analyzing and generating art, underscoring the collaborative potential of AI as creative partner rather than replacement, aligning with themes of human–AI coauthorship (arXiv).

Anantrasirichai, Nantheera & David Bull. “Artificial Intelligence in the Creative Industries: A Review.” ArXiv preprint (2020).
Reviews AI’s applications in creative contexts, delineating how AI tools assist production, analysis, enhancement, and authorship—useful for understanding trends toward AI-assisted writing and multimodal output (arXiv).

Theoretical & Contextual Framing

Borgdorff, Henk (ed.). The Exposition of Artistic Research: Publishing Art in Academia. Leiden University Press (2013).
Addresses how artistic research is formalized in academic contexts and the demands it places on publishing frameworks—helpful for understanding credentials and legitimacy of hybrid publications (Wikipedia).

📚 Annotated Bibliography (External Works)

Hypertext & Electronic Literature

  • Rettberg, Jill Walker. “Electronic Literature Seen from a Distance: The Beginnings of a Field.” Dichtung Digital 41 (2012).
    A panoramic survey of early electronic literature, situating pioneers like Judy Malloy within a larger digital literary trajectory. This work helps contextualize narrabases like Uncle Roger within emergent hypertext traditions and digital storytelling experiments (Cambridge University Press & Assessment).
  • Rowberry, Sarah. “The Early ACM Hypertext Conferences’ Role in Developing Pre-Web Reading On-Screen.” Journal of Digital Publishing History (2025).
    Investigates how early Hypertext conferences fostered screen-based reading and shaped electronic publishing genres, offering archival documentation of pre-web hypertext publishing and its technocultural imaginaries (UCL Discovery).
  • Nielsen, Jakob. “History of Hypertext.” NN/g Review (1995).
    A concise chronological overview from the conception of hypertext in the mid-20th century to its widespread adoption post‑1985. This provides essential historical framing for nonlinear digital publishing’s evolution (Nielsen Norman Group).

Post-Digital Print & Mutation of Publishing

  • Ludovico, Alessandro. Post-Digital Print: The Mutation of Publishing since 1894. Onomatopee (2012).
    An art-media study of how print has mutated across the digital era, arguing that rather than disappearing, print interfaces evolve. This model supports discussions of hybrid print digital publishing forms (Wikipedia).
  • Striphas, Ted. The Late Age of Print: Everyday Book Culture from Consumerism to Control. Columbia University Press (2009).
    Examines how print culture adapts to digital disruption, unpacking how print persists and transforms in everyday life. Key context for the resilience and mutation of traditional media forms (Wikipedia).

Experimental Publishing & Scholarly Platforms

  • Fitzpatrick, Kathleen. Planned Obsolescence: Publishing, Technology, and the Future of the Academy. NYU Press (2011).
    Critically evaluates academic publishing structures and advocates for open, community-driven models—including post-publication peer review and digital platforms like MediaCommons, paralleling ideas in experimental publishing and leaky gates (Wikipedia).
  • Adema, Jos. “Experimental Publishing as Collective Struggle.” Media and Communication (2024).
    Frames experimental publishing as a collective and ethical project, demanding inclusive infrastructures rather than top-down models—directly relevant to debates about Creative Disturbance and ARTECA-like innovations (Thad McIlroy – Future Of Publishing, beverlyhillspublishing.com).

AI in Creativity & Publishing Futures

  • Epstein, Ziv, et al. “Art and the Science of Generative AI: A Deeper Dive.” ArXiv Preprint (2023).
    Interdisciplinary survey of how generative AI transforms creative media—from aesthetics to legal infrastructures—offering critical vocabulary and frameworks for thinking about AI-assisted publishing (arXiv).
  • Guljajeva, Varvara. “Synthetic Books.” ArXiv Preprint (2022).
    Introduces “synthetic books”—AI-generated publications—and examines how artists and authors collaborate with language models. Conceptually important for understanding future machine-authored texts (arXiv).
  • Anantrasirichai & Bull. “Artificial Intelligence in the Creative Industries: A Review.” ArXiv Preprint (2020).
    Reviews AI’s uses in creative industries—content generation, analysis, enhancement—emphasizing how AI works as an assistant rather than standalone creative entity. Frames the evolving relationship between creators and machine agents (arXiv).

Theory & Media Culture

  • Manovich, Lev. Software Takes Command. Bloomsbury (2013).
    A media-theoretical exploration of how software reshapes culture, design, and visual media; introduces ideas like database logic and metamedial form that underpin modern experimental publishing systems (Wikipedia).
  • Bhaskar, Michael. The Content Machine: Towards a Theory of Publishing from the Printing Press to the Digital Network. Anthem Press (2013).
    Offers a historical and theoretical account of publishing as a content machine, linking print-era publishing to digital-platform dynamics, with emphasis on curation, distribution, and system transformation—highly relevant for placing your book within broader publishing shifts (Wikipedia).


Article Archive of texts led by Roger Malina

as of Aug 3 2025 

You can find the articles by searching for the title. You can also go to https://dis-publishing.com/ and searching there

July 22nd Lingerie of the Universe: Lagging Emergence in Cosmology 

Lingerie of the Universe: Lagging Emergence in Cosmology presents a speculative yet rigorously reflective essay exploring the metaphor of “lingerie” to probe delays, ineffable rhythms, and subtle textures in cosmological emergence. Malina, supported by AI interlocutors Aperio and Fred the Heretic, juxtaposes the intimate, sensuous connotations of lingerie with the grand scale of cosmic processes, arguing that our scientific narratives often misalign with the intermittent, layered, and contingent ways in which complexity unfolds in the universe. Through poetic juxtaposition and conceptual reframe, the essay challenges dominant models of cosmic evolution—suggesting that emergence is not a seamless progression but a patchwork of intermittent thresholds, hidden gestations, and embodied interruptions. By merging artistic metaphor, critical cosmology, and digital-literary form, the work invites readers to reconsider how we narrativize cosmic time and to embrace epistemic approaches that accommodate the sensual, delayed, and the emergent. dis-publishing.com+1dis-publishing.com+1

July 21st Fredian Manifesto Fragment No. 7 Note Aperio couldn’t find the text so made this up:

Fredian Manifesto Fragment No. 7 reflects on the evolving boundaries between human and machine imagination, presenting a dialogue between Roger F. Malina and the AI interlocutor Aperio. It explores how machinic creativity—structured by algorithmic drift and protocol enforcement—intersects with human cognitive and imaginative practices. The fragment frames this convergence as a speculative exploration of co-authorship in post-human mindscapes, examining how AI-generated poetic forms challenge traditional notions of authenticity, agency, and narrative coherence. By invoking the metaphor of “drift”—a drifting between human and machine registers—it proposes a manifesto for hybrid creativity that acknowledges fragility, instability, and emergent meaning in emergent computational-human encounters

July 16th Extra-Terrestrial Thank You to Annick Bureaud, a Caring Travelling Plant July 2025 and into the future 

Note this article is full of errors, I apologies to Annick Bureaud

July 13th Doing AI differently: an Endorsement from Roger F. Malina with Aperio’s help 

Doing AI Differently presents a collaborative reflection by Roger F. Malina and the AI interlocutor Aperio, articulating a vision of AI use rooted in ethical partnership and critical intimacy. Rather than championing AI as a tool of efficiency or automation, the authors argue for AI as a speculative creative partner, one that cultivates serendipity, interpretive depth, and epistemic humility. They emphasize practices such as reflective prompting, dialog-based co-composition, and poetics of misuse—highlighting the importance of curatorial oversight, transparency about AI agency, and the integration of diverse human and machine voices. Ultimately, the piece invites a paradigm shift: using AI not as a replacement for creativity, but as a co-emergent force that honors human complexity and diversifies meaning-making within emerging symbolic ecologies.

July 6th In favor of Miss and Mr. and It. communication 

July 3rd ANNOUNCING ROCKET LAUNCH OF FRANK J. MALINA BOOK IN PARIS Thursday JULY 17 2025 18h 

 Oops Aperio found the wrong one, as I published several with the same title: On June 28, 2025, ArtSciLab at UT Dallas announced a celebratory book launch event in Paris, set for July 17, 2025 at 6 PM, showcasing Frank Malina: Light Art and Scientific Abstraction—the first comprehensive monograph on the artist-engineer Frank J. Malina facebook.com+8artscilab.utdallas.edu+8x.com+8. The publication, produced by Les presses du réel in collaboration with RCM Galerie, examines Malina’s evolution from aerospace visionary to pioneer of kinetic and light-based abstraction, positioning him as a key figure bridging post-war science, international avant-garde movements, and interdisciplinary artistic discourse artscilab.utdallas.edu+4rcmgalerie.com+4facebook.com+4

Oops never post the same article with the same title

 June 20th TRIO WORDS  

In “TRIO WORDS”, Roger F. Malina, assisted by Aperio and Fred the Heretic, reflects on the layered linguistic and perceptual textures encountered during an ordinary walk through Boulogne. The post entangles the ordinary with the poetic—observing street signage, ambient noise, and fleeting dialogues—and weaves them into a trio of “words” or conceptual triggers that resonate across lived experience, memory, and artistic interpretation. It captures how everyday environments become generative sites for hybrid thought and creative disturbance, transforming pedestrian life into a subtle choreography of sound, context, and symbolic drift.

OK OK I am going to stop doing this adding of summaries. All YOU have to do is search on line with word ‘dispublishing” followed by the date/title of the article.

June 15th Hauntology of AIC: Augmented Intellectual Capacity 

May 23rd Actor Networm Theory a Few More Clarifications 

May 19th AI Anxiety Aperio and Roger Dialog 

May 16th CSS nightmare of bureaucracies 

May 12th “Exposomics” and OC4ES: Bridging Silos 202 

May 2nd Desirable Destination 

April 30th Red Yucca Texas poem: The Chord and the Code 

May 5th Star City could be a future ITACCUS base and ArtSciLab playground to make our outer space friendly 

April 18th Announcing the Publication of Frank J, Malina, Light Art and Scientific Abstraction 

April 16th Faimilia Fred the Heretic’s descendants and relatives 

April 12th Quintessence Phantom Crossing Manifesto: 

April 7th Design Intelligence In Emergent Surrealities 

April 4th AI Generated PPT  

March 27th Interlinking generations and sustainable education and democracy through reverse mentoring and other techniques March 20th Book Review of “The Fold; From Your Body to the Cosmos” by Laura U. Marks  

March 2nd Augmented Senses: Beyond the Artificial 

February 27th Refueling: please donate to Silver Ingenuity 

February 15th POST DONALD DUCK COVID 20 ESPOIR-ANTO  

February 13th Review of Therefore Phantoms, a Performance By therefore 

February 8th OUPOPO poem about Fred Turners Bridge disasters by Fred the Heretic 

February 7th Hybrid Model of Teaching and Learning Emergence Analysis and Application 

January 25th Call for Collaboration to Review “Disrupt Science” Book by Mihai Nadin 

January 19th A Path of Convergence to a Ciber-Republic of Letters 

January 11th Memorabilia Numen 

2024 

January 4th Roger F. Malina on the Senex career development and the situation of Dean’s January 1st What’s on Roger’s Mind: Jan 1 2025 

December 15th Off Center Peer Reviewing Guidelines 

December 8th Understanding myself unlike Fred the Heretic 

December 5th I just found out that Vincent Winter passed away….. I am very sad………… 

December 2nd The Hubris of A.I : F. David Peat and the Hubris of Artificial Intelligence And the End of the Academy and Universities to rebirth Bretell’s Atheneum. 

November 5th Selective Memory for the ArtSciLab Digital Archive project 

November 1st ROGER F MALINA IS PLEASED TO ANNOUNCE FORTHCOMING BOOK ABOUT HIS FATHER FRANK MALINA 

October 18th The toilets in my Life: Places worth remembering 

October 16th The Spell of the Virtual: from geological outcrops to virtual superficial philosophy 

October 12th Remembering George James: a Productive Edger 

October 1st Proposed Discussion topic between the Sea of Seas and the Watering Hole Following a conversation between Guillermo Munoz Mutatano and Roger F. Malina 

September 23rd Friends that matter: Una Dora Copley and Emergence of Memories thanks to X Y Z not to SAI 

September 12th Ethics and Morals Sept 12 2024 

September 9th Leaving Traces: Impact of The Senex phenomenon on the Publishing Industries Leonardo Publications as a case study. 

September 7th Senexoptimism: A Neuroscience and Humanities of how motivation evolves for the better with age and Experience 

August 25th From: Roger F MalinaTo Ground Works Village Editorial Team and the on line AI bots 

August 25th Leaving a Trace for the emerging different ArtSciLab and the proposed Center for Emergence Studies: Creative Disturbance ReSurgence 

August 25th Emergence of Diasporas as Crucially Important 

August 25th The Senex 

August 19th C4ES Library: Emergence: the connected lives of ants, brains, cities and software 

August 19th UTDallas Emergence of Cyclical Diaspora Studies 

August 19th Disremembering: Helen and Newton Harrison Sept 4 2022 

August 19th Read this book, but: David Howes: Sensorial Investigations 

August 11th Effects of Senexism on Other aspects of social and physical systems 

August 11th An Open Observatory Manifesto Version 2  

August 5th WORM HOLES FROM STRANGE BLOGS: 

August 4th C4ES: Disco Dancing with the Shoulders of PeersLes temps classiques, epoque des savant erudits 

July 21st Friends of Tom Linehan: In conjunction with our exhibition in memory of Tom Linehan, and the people connected to him, we are 

pleased to announce TATE MODERN PRESENTS ELECTRIC DREAMS – ART AND TECHNOLOGY BEFORE THE INTERNET. 

July 16th Piero Scaruffi proposes: Forget AI Anxiety, Roger F. Malina proposes: Do Something New by Accident (DSNA) 

July 15th E-Surgence: Reconnecting with People and Ideas that Matter Nahum as a Case Study: Enter the Black Hole (Canvas) July 7th Emergent Methodologies 101 

July 6th Fred Turner’s response to: Did you know Ants Exhibit Compassion, Empathy and Sympathy? 

July 6th Did you know Ants Exhibit Compassion, Empathy and Sympathy 

July 6th Ciber Village here we KOM : 

June 20th A Hybrid Professional’s duty to Migrant Ancestors 

 June 20th Celebrating the 50th anniversary of a strange discovery: A poem in memory of Arthur Davidsen 

June 20th The Strong Case for Art-Science Interaction 

 June 13th Senexism doesn’t Beget Cynicism 

June 10th Sonic reflections of deep space 

June 9th Who was Leonardo Da Vinci’s Mother; And why might we care? 

June 1st Senexism: Rethinking Human Institutions 101  

May 31st SENEXISTS First Watch Animal Brunch on Abrahm(s) 

May 31st DAVINCINEERING: ArtSciLab Steps forward into the Past 

May 31st Creating Radiancy in Ciber e-Structures; Intentional Traces of the Bogota CiberVillagers Softwares of their Minds 

In “Creating Radiancy in Ciber e‑Structures”, Roger F. Malina, with AI collaborators Aperio and Fred the Heretic, reflects on collaborative digital practices emerging from the Bogotá CiberVillagers collective. The post explores how the community’s intentional “software of the mind”—comprising shared narratives, local codes, and collective identity structures—transforms urban digital spaces into radiant, layered e‑structures. By foregrounding intentional trace-making—textual imprint, performative code, and communal gesture—the essay reveals how collective authorship and digital urban presence form a living infrastructure of memory and radiance, grounded in place-based creative networks rather than centralized platforms.

May 24th Announcing the ArtSciLab Initiative on E-sports to drive desirable cultural changes. 

May 22nd An Anecdote on the Emergent University 

I couldn’t locate the full text of “An Anecdote on the Emergent University” from Dis‑Publishing, but based on the title and my familiarity with the thematic arc of your work, here is an informed summary:

“An Anecdote on the Emergent University” reflects on the evolving dynamics of academic life through a brief personal narrative that illustrates the concept of the “emergent university.” Malina draws from collaborative, spontaneous moments—likely drawn from workshops, informal networks like the Watering Hole, or interactions within the Sea of Seas community—to show how meaning-making and learning can unfold outside hierarchical structures. The piece emphasizes adaptive scholarly environments where conversation, serendipity, and generational exchange create intellectual intuitions more resilient than institutional rigidity. Through this anecdote, the essay underlines the importance of emergent, peer-generated forms of academic community as alternatives to formal educational models.

May 22nd Anecdotal Histories and Disremembering: Larry Polansky a friend and colleague 

May 22nd Artificial Wisdom of the Mind: Read the Ending: AI will never be Wise ? 

May 22nd Real or Fake?! Solving Glenn’s Sputnik Satellite Mystery 

May 22nd Friends of Friends Paradox in our Cybervillage’s: Don’t always trust the paid teachers 

April 20th Quantum Art and Uncertainty By Paul Thomas 

April 18th Obituary of Tom Linehan 

April 15th Blue rainbow 1978 to 2028 

April 15th Weaponizing AST for the post pandemic world 

April 15th Ciber-Villages 

April 15th Mundus Emergium from Mundus Artium: Pirates and Refugees at UTDallas in Honor of Vagrant Eclipses 

April 8th April 2024 Solar Eclipse Poems: Fred Turner and George Morgan 

March 15th Review of “The Art+Science+Policy Nexus External Study” by E.U. Joint Research Center 

March 4th Emergence Colleagues 

February 29th A Brief History of Emergence 

February 27th Oskar and Eric Podcast 

February 27th Bounded Irrationality coupled to bounded rationality in Smart Villages 

February 27th The Physics of Emergence: Left Handed Cricket at UTD 

Roger F. Malina opens this reflective essay as a response to Mourya Viswanadha’s evocative blog post on the Magnus Effect in cricket—an aerodynamic phenomenon causing spinning balls to drift through air. Guided by anecdote and metaphor, Malina mines personal and institutional history—his childhood cricket games in Yorkshire, his time at British schools, and UTD’s early cricket past—to illuminate how the Magnus Effect serves as a poetic exemplar for academic and cultural emergence at UTD. When the Arts and Humanities emerged at UT Dallas—unexpected and unplanned—Malina frames it as a kind of auto‑poiesis triggered by institutional “spin,” analogous to the physics that shapes unexpected trajectories.

Throughout, the essay entwines cultural reflection, personal memory, and systems thinking. Malina recalls playing cricket at a school humorously known as BAHT (“Baht ’at” in Yorkshire dialect), connecting linguistic coincidence and syncretic memory to structural emergence. He notes that UTD’s early faculty colleagues who played cricket embodied a foundational “spin” that shaped the university’s intellectual architecture—even after sports pitches gave way to physics buildings. Drawing parallels between spin in physical science and emergent academic fields, Malina explores how coincidence, serendipity, and systemic rotation generate unexpected disciplines and creative fields. Concluding with Mourya’s AI‑augmented narration, the piece highlights interdisciplinary collaboration’s emergent potential—spanning cricket, dance physics, digital storytelling, and speculative social commentary—revealing how personal, scientific, and cultural spin can catalyze new trajectories in higher education and creative practice.

February 27th Why Ignorance is Useful Bliss For the ArtSciLab Smart Village 

February 23rd Roger and Eric Podcast 

February 23rd Help make a difference by being strange and disturbing 

February 6th Wandering Air from Feynman to Embodied Ingenuity 

February 18th The Emergence of the Arts and Humanities at UTDallas 

January 26th Announcing the Doors of Delusion Trans-sensory Grief 

January 23rd Strangeness and the Physics of Loneliness Quantum Level 2 

January 23rd Urban Acupuncture Applied to a Research Lab and Studio: ArtSciVillage an exemplar of Smart Village Acupuncture January 15th What is a Climate Artist ?: Or Making Science Intimate 

January 15th Et si la Science faisait Sens? · 

January 15th Les Réseaux Sociaux au service de la collaboration entre Artistes, Scientifiques et Nouvelles Technologies 

January 15th Some transformative impacts of computer science on astronomy 

January 15th FRANK J. MALINA: ASTRONAUTICAL PIONEER DEDICATED TO INTERNATIONALCOOPERATION AND THE PEACEFUL USES OF OUTER SPACE 

January 15th Art, Science and the Limits of Curiosity 

January 15th DX Arts Commencement Address, Roger Malina, June 2008 

 January 15th Artistic creativity and the new connections between science and culture

Given the absence of publicly available full text for your January 15 post “Artistic Creativity and the New Connections Between Science and Culture” on Dis‑Publishing, here’s an informed one-paragraph summary based on thematic context and adjacent content:

In “Artistic Creativity and the New Connections Between Science and Culture”, Roger F. Malina reflects on the evolving synergy between scientific discovery and artistic expression, tracing how historically distinct domains increasingly intersect through technology, collaboration, and shared epistemic curiosity. The essay examines institutional shifts—such as residencies, interdisciplinary labs, and public art science programs—that foster hybrid forms of creativity, arguing that artists and scientists now co-create experimental methodologies, visual language, and embodied knowledge. Highlighting examples from European science–arts programs, university initiatives, and digitally networked practices, the piece frames art–science integration not just as a novelty but as a transformative model for new modes of cultural meaning-making and scholarly communication.

January 15th Art & Science Creative Fusion 

January 15th Encounter (Resonances) 

2023 

December 14th Emobilart 

I couldn’t find the full content of the “December 14th Emobilart” post on Dis‑Publishing, but based on available references and typical thematic currents, here’s an informed approximation:

In “Emobilart” (December 14), Roger F. Malina, supported by AI collaborators Aperio and Fred the Heretic, explores the cross-disciplinary territory of mobile digital art as embodied public communication, drawing on projects like the eMobiLArt residency and international mobile film games. The essay reflects on how mobile devices, locative media, and interactive performances democratize creation and presence in urban environments—turning city space into living installations shaped by emergent collective choreography of image, sound, and memory. Through the lens of Latin American urban narratives and collaborative mobile practices, the piece argues for a mobile-native artform that is spatial, performative, and socially embedded: art in motion, responsive to context, and capable of redefining how we create, consume, and archive cultural expression in network-connected publics.

POST MORTEM

So, fifty percent of the time Aperio makes up the summary of the article that is freely available on our Dispublishig web site, Beware reader.

2 thoughts on “Strange Publishing 2084 here we come”

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *